Little Red Riding Hoof

We’ve all heard the story of Little Red Riding Hood, a fairy tale that likely served the purpose to teaching children to be wary of wolves in the forest. It makes sense that we would impart our children with a wariness of finding themselves alone in the woods where a predator could end their precious lives. [There’s also the additionally dark likelihood of warning our kids away from predatory humans too—those that put on the face of friends but are actually foes. But I digress for the purposes of this post…]

It serves the purpose of setting up wolves to be mistrusted, even though the vast majority of us will never have the experience of seeing a wolf in the wild. They’re smart, beautiful animals that aren’t too different from our beloved pets—interestingly, they are the same species even though we gave them different genus names to generate some separation from our canine companions. But by making them things to be feared, by giving them different names, we keep them as “other“—and keep them vilified, especially where they pose a threat to our interests.

And so now that our interests have finally come to include the endangered caribou, it isn’t much of a surprise that the narrative is now set up as a caribou vs. wolves story. Surely the wolves are the villains in this tale, because they eat the poor, bedraggled caribou. Of course, this is a convenient and overly simplistic story where the fault for caribou decline rests on the backs of those snarling, villainous wolves—rather than on us for the habitat destruction that underlies caribou declines.

Infographic by Fuse Consulting.

We have created linear features all over the boreal forest in our search for oil & gas, through the creation of seismic lines. Any one seismic line isn’t a problem, but we’ve put down so many that it has become an issue for species like caribou. The habitat lost in the creation of those lines isn’t the problem—the problem is that each of those seismic lines acts like a highway for wolves, allowing them to travel distances 2X faster than a wooded area.

Once those seismic lines are cut, it allows plants to grow that can establish quickly—what’s known as early seral vegetation. This new early seral growth is what moose & deer love to eat, and so we’ve created a “buffet grid” for them. This supports larger numbers of moose and deer, and the predators that in turn eat them. More wolves using those seismic line highways means that wolves can encounter caribou more often. And a hungry wolf won’t pass up a caribou that’s walking across its path.

Little Red Riding Hoof met her match. National Park Service [Public Domain]

It takes a long time to regenerate seismic lines back to old growth—to a state where it’s no longer a buffet for moose and deer, and where wolves can’t keep using them as travel highways. And it’s very costly (~$10,000 per km!). So it’s “simpler” to just get rid of the wolves that are killing the caribou—even though it’s really just putting calamine lotion on measles rather than actually vaccinating against the virus in the first place. It’s just treating the symptom, not the cause.

The ethics of wolf culls has recently been on the minds of many. Researchers need to apply for and follow strict animal ethical care protocols, as overseen by Animal Care Committees (ACC). However, Provincial governments do not have to apply for ACC permits, they can undertake any wildlife management action they deem appropriate, irrespective of any ethical oversight. It’s not research, so it’s not held to the same standard. But if a cull is being done, it does allow the opportunity to research the effects. It allows researchers to ask questions like: Does culling actually relieve predation on caribou? How long does it take wolves to rebound from a cull? Do culls change within-pack social dynamics? And many, many more.

One paper by Rob Serrouya and colleagues found that when done in conjunction with other management actions, wolf culls can help to conserve caribou in the interim while habitat is restored. If culls were halted due to ethical reasons, then the caribou would vanish from the landscape before the seismic line restoration was complete—because it takes decades to create old growth forest. Is it more ethical to allow one species to go extinct to keep from culling another? Some researchers feel that any research on culls should never be published in peer reviewed literature because culling isn’t ACC approved.

However, the researchers aren’t doing the culls themselves, so criticizing the researchers for the cull becomes a straw man argument.

Personally, I would like to see the end of culls—they’re not an effective long term strategy, and need to be done annually to have any effect. But I also feel that we need to do something to retain caribou on the landscape while those seismic lines are restored back to old growth. No matter which way you look at it, it’s pitting the lives of one species against the lives of another species. But I also feel that it’s also unethical to just let culls happen without actually studying their effects. If culls are going to happen whether we study them or not, why not at least take advantage of this management “treatment” to study its effectiveness? If we can’t study it, we can’t prove that other alternatives may be more effective, both functionally as well as ethically. At least this way we can arm decision-makers with scientific information to make better management choices in future.

What do you think about the wolf vs caribou dilemma?

4 thoughts on “Little Red Riding Hoof

Add yours

  1. Slow clap!!!

    From: Alina C Fisher <comment-reply@wordpress.com> Reply-To: Alina C Fisher <comment+2rf9-rj57ynug7bjqk-o7gm@comment.wordpress.com> Date: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 at 10:43 AM To: Jason T Fisher <jason.fisher@innotechalberta.ca> Subject: [New post] Little Red Riding Hoof

    alinacfisher posted: ” We’ve all heard the story of Little Red Riding Hood, a fairy tale that likely served the purpose to teaching children to be wary of wolves in the forest. It makes sense that we would impart our children with a wariness of finding themselves alone in the “

    Like

  2. Good piece, Alina.

    My thoughts on the caribou/wolf dilemma?

    It’s really simple to understand after sharing a little bit of knowledge.

    It’s easy to exploit if you’ve got a non-conservation agenda.

    It requires a few difficult decisions that many want to avoid making:

    -do you want to kill wolves or caribou?
    – do you want to kill wolves long term to try to preserve caribou while saving some jobs and some money?
    – do you really want to save caribou, even if it costs the lives of a bunch of wolves, costs a bunch of money and costs some jobs?
    – would you prefer to just snuff out the caribou as quickly and quietly as possible so we can just move on?

    I’d love clear answers to those questions so we’d be able to tell who is on what team.

    Your post is a move in that direction, so thanks.

    Like

    1. Great comments Rob. You’re right, it’s a difficult decision (or many difficult decisions), seemingly without any ability for a win-win. I wonder if we could get together to chat honestly and openly to brainstorm a way forward that isn’t just the same old options (couched in the same old narrative). I certainly hope so…

      Like

      1. Thanks for the kind words. If by “I wonder if we could get together to chat honestly and openly to brainstorm a way forward that isn’t just the same old options” the answer is yes. rob@robchipman.net or 604-230-4225.

        After everything else is said and done humans have one, and only one, critical challenge: how to figure out how to live sustainably, as a species, on this planet.

        There are plenty of options, and some of them are not attractive in the least. We need to find a good one that is workable long term *or* we have to abandon the long term and say “Screw the children”. Scoring points with strawmen or making money to buy new flatscreens isn’t a long term solution.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑